Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments: What changes for communities?

Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments

Table of contents

What you need to know about the Supreme Court Ruling on tourist apartments

  • Since 3 April 2025, a new tourist apartment in a homeowner community requires express prior approval by three-fifths of the owners, reversing the previous default.
  • A general statutory reference to residential use is not enough to prohibit tourist apartments, so any prohibition must be express, and since 3 April 2025 an express agreement of three-fifths of the owners and of the participation quotas is enough to prohibit them.
  • A tourist licence or regional registration is an administrative authorisation that does not replace the community approval now required by article 7.3 of the Horizontal Property Law for a new tourist apartment, so both are needed.
  • Communities may increase common expenses by up to twenty per cent for tourist apartments, approved by a three-fifths majority, with no retroactive effect.
  • The state single short-term rental register was annulled in 2026 after a challenge led by the Generalitat Valenciana, so the national registration number is no longer required.

How has the Supreme Court Ruling affected property owners?

The Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments has reshaped how homeowner communities and individual owners approach short-term lets across Spain.

What began as a single clarifying decision has become a settled body of case law, reinforced by a major reform of the Ley de Propiedad Horizontal that took effect on 3 April 2025.

This guide sets out where the law stands in 2026, so that both communities and owners of tourist apartments in homeowner communities can act with confidence.

How Ley Orgánica 1/2025 changed the rules on tourist apartments

The reform of article 17.12 of the Ley de Propiedad Horizontal, introduced by Ley Orgánica 1/2025, entered into force on 3 April 2025 and altered the starting point completely.

Before that date, a tourist apartment was permitted unless the community had expressly prohibited it.

From that date, a new tourist apartment is prohibited unless the community expressly authorises it, under the new article 7.3 of the Ley de Propiedad Horizontal.

The table below summarises the shift that every owner of tourist apartments should understand.

AspectBefore 3 April 2025From 3 April 2025
Default ruleTourist use permitted unless expressly prohibitedTourist use prohibited unless expressly authorised
New tourist apartmentNo prior community approval requiredPrior express approval required (article 7.3 LPH)
Community majorityThree-fifths to limit or prohibitThree-fifths to approve, condition or prohibit
Cost adjustmentNo specific surcharge mechanismCommon expenses may rise up to twenty per cent for tourist apartments
Existing activityContinued unless prohibitedProtected if lawfully operating before the reform with the relevant permits

Tourist licences and community approval are separate requirements

A frequent misunderstanding is that a municipal licence or a regional tourist registration guarantees the right to operate.

Article 7.3 of the Horizontal Property Law requires the prior express approval of the community of owners for a new tourist apartment, in addition to compliance with the sector tourism rules.

Whether a licence or registration can be relied on against a prohibition recorded in your community’s statutes depends on the wording of those statutes and on your case. Contact us on +34 963 74 16 57 or at felix.delaguia@delaguialuzon.com to confirm your position.

The practical lesson is that community approval and administrative permits are two separate requirements, and both must be satisfied before letting a property to visitors, a distinction that also matters when you rent your flat through a platform in Valencia.

The end of the state register and the Valencian angle

On 19 May 2026, the Supreme Court annulled the provisions on the state single short-term rental register created by Royal Decree 1312/2024, in a judgment published in the BOE on 8 June 2026.

The Court found that the State lacked the competence to impose a national register that overlapped the regional tourist registers already in place.

The challenge was led by the Generalitat Valenciana, a point of particular relevance for owners and communities across the Valencian Community, which already operates its own regional registration system, as explained in the official note from the General Council of the Judiciary.

The national registration number is therefore no longer required, although regional and municipal obligations continue to apply in full.

The main decisions on tourist apartments at a glance

Decision or instrumentDateCore point
Ley Orgánica 1/2025In force 3 April 2025Reworked article 17.12 and added article 7.3 LPH; prior community approval now required
Supreme Court ruling 264/202518 February 2025A general reference to residential use does not prohibit tourist apartments; prohibition must be express
Supreme Court plenary rulings (Judiciary’s note)Note of 7 October 2024Communities may prohibit tourist use with a three-fifths majority; limitation includes total prohibition
Supreme Court ruling 620/202619 May 2026 (BOE of 8 June 2026)The state single short-term rental register was annulled after a challenge led by the Generalitat Valenciana

Practical consequences for communities and owners

The current Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments and the 2025 reform together carry several concrete implications.

  • Communities that wish to prohibit tourist apartments should review and, where necessary, amend their statutes so that the prohibition is expressly recorded.
  • A qualified majority of three-fifths of the owners, representing three-fifths of the participation quotas, is required to approve, condition or prohibit the activity.
  • Owners who were lawfully operating before 3 April 2025, holding the relevant regional and municipal permits, retain protection for their existing activity.
  • A community may approve a surcharge of up to twenty per cent on the common expenses of tourist apartments, provided it is not applied retroactively.

Legal recommendations after the ruling on tourist apartments

In light of the settled position, we recommend the following steps to homeowner communities and individual owners.

  1. Review the current statutes of the community carefully to confirm what they permit, condition or prohibit.
  2. Consider amending the statutes if you wish to regulate, authorise or prohibit tourist apartments under the new framework.
  3. Seek specialist legal advice to draft clauses that are clear, valid and correctly registered.
  4. Where a dispute arises, consider mediation as a first option before resorting to litigation.

How we can help with the Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments

At Delaguía y Luzón, we advise both homeowner communities and individual property owners on the practical impact of the Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments.

Our team helps clients navigate these questions so that their interests are protected, and their position complies with current legislation.

  • Statute review, analysing your community’s statutes to identify legal gaps or the need for amendments.
  • Specialist advice on adapting the statutes to the current case law and the 2025 reform.
  • Legal drafting of clear and valid clauses to authorise, regulate or prohibit tourist apartments.
  • Representation in litigation, offering a robust defence in disputes over tourist apartments in homeowner communities.
  • Mediation, facilitating amicable resolution between owners and communities.
  • Guidance on licences and regional registration, so that community approval and administrative permits are correctly aligned.

Speak to a property law specialist

Our lawyers can review your statutes, advise on the correct majorities and represent your community or your investment in any dispute over tourist apartments.

Contact our legal team for personalised guidance on your case, or read more about our property law services.

felix.delaguia@delaguialuzon.com

+34 963 74 16 57

Frequently asked questions

What did the Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments decide?

The ruling of 18 February 2025 (no. 264/2025) held that a general reference to residential use in the statutes is not sufficient to prohibit tourist apartments, so a ban must be express.

Can my community ban tourist apartments in 2026?

Yes, a community may prohibit the activity through an express agreement adopted by a three-fifths majority of owners and participation quotas.

What majority is needed to authorise or prohibit the activity?

Three-fifths of the total owners, representing three-fifths of the participation quotas, is required to approve, condition or prohibit tourist apartments.

I already run a tourist apartment. Am I affected?

If you were operating lawfully before 3 April 2025 with the relevant regional and municipal permits, your existing activity is protected, although you should keep your documentation up to date.

Does a tourist licence protect me from a community prohibition?

A licence or registration is an administrative authorisation and does not replace the community approval required by article 7.3 of the Horizontal Property Law for a new tourist apartment. Whether it protects you against a prohibition recorded in your community’s statutes depends on your case, so contact us to confirm.

Can the community charge tourist apartments higher fees?

A community may approve a surcharge of up to twenty per cent on the common expenses of tourist apartments, adopted by the same three-fifths majority.

Is the surcharge retroactive?

No, the surcharge cannot be applied retroactively to owners who were already operating before the relevant agreement was adopted.

Do I still need the state single rental register?

No, the national single register was annulled in 2026, so the national registration number is no longer required, though regional and municipal obligations remain.

How does this affect tourist apartments in Valencia specifically?

The Valencian Community operates its own regional registration system, and the challenge to the state register was led by the Generalitat Valenciana, so owners here continue to work within the regional framework.

What should our community do next?

Review your statutes now, decide whether to authorise, condition or prohibit the activity, and seek specialist advice to record the decision correctly and register it where required.

 

FAQ on Supreme Court ruling on tourist apartments

Can homeowner communities prohibit tourist apartments without modifying their statutes?

A prohibition must be express. Since 3 April 2025, article 17.12 of the Horizontal Property Law lets the community approve, limit, condition or prohibit tourist rentals by an express agreement of three-fifths of the owners and of the participation quotas, whether or not the statutes are modified.

Three-fifths of the owners, who must also represent three-fifths of the participation quotas, whether or not the agreement amends the statutes (article 17.12 of the Horizontal Property Law).

The Supreme Court ruling of 18 February 2025 held that a general description of the flats as residential is not enough to prohibit tourist rentals. A new tourist rental still needs the prior express approval of the community under article 7.3 of the Horizontal Property Law, so contact us to check your community’s position.

Only if you were already operating under the tourism rules before 3 April 2025, which the law protects (additional provision 2 of the Horizontal Property Law), or if the community has approved the activity. Contact us to check your case.

If the prohibition is clearly stated in the statutes, it remains valid. Otherwise, it could be challenged based on this ruling.

They will need to review and, if necessary, modify their statutes to include a clear and explicit prohibition.

Mediation is an effective tool to resolve conflicts amicably between owners and communities, avoiding costly litigation.

It is advisable to consult a specialized lawyer to review and update the statutes in accordance with the new jurisprudence.

Table of contents

Share on